The U.S. and China trade war has been ongoing for over a year now, with no end in sight. However, the recent signing of the Phase One trade agreement between the two nations has given some hope for a de-escalation of the conflict.
One key element in the agreement is the inclusion of an “out clause”. This clause allows either party to withdraw from the agreement if they feel that it is not being upheld by the other side. This has been a major concern for the U.S. government, which has been pushing for more strict enforcement of intellectual property rights and greater access to Chinese markets.
The out clause is seen as a way to ensure that both parties are held accountable for their actions. If either party feels that the other is not living up to their commitments, they can trigger the clause and withdraw from the agreement.
The out clause has been praised by many observers as a significant step forward in the U.S.-China trade relationship. It provides a mechanism for both parties to hold each other accountable, which is essential for long-term cooperation.
However, there are also concerns that the out clause could be abused. Some fear that either party could use it as a pretext for exiting the agreement if they feel that it is no longer in their best interests. Others worry that it could be used as leverage in future negotiations, with one party threatening to trigger the clause if they don`t get what they want.
Overall, the out clause in the Phase One trade agreement is a positive development. It provides a way for both parties to ensure that the agreement is being upheld, which is essential for long-term cooperation. However, it will require careful monitoring to ensure that it is not abused and that it is used in good faith by both sides.
Comments are closed.